By Dr Rosemary Listing, PhD (Law) · Medical negligence specialist · Of Counsel, Peter Evans & Associates
Last updated 3 November 2026
The short answer
If you were harmed by medical care in the ACT, the ACT's law decides your claim. Here is what matters most:
Time limit
Strict: 3 years from the injury, with very limited extensions. Get advice nowBefore court
Notice of claim under the Civil Law (Wrongs) ActPain & suffering
No statutory capComplaints
ACT Human Rights Commission (Health Services Commissioner)A summary only. Each rule has exceptions, explained below.
A claim in ACT at a glance · tap a step to read about it
- 1RecordsGet your medical records and write down what happened
- 2When you found outThe clock often starts later than the operation
- 3Expert reviewAn independent expert compares your care with the standard
- 4Notice of claimPre-court steps under the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act
- 5ResolutionMost claims settle by negotiation or mediation
Don't rule yourself out: the clock may have started later than you think. Once it is running, a complaint doesn't pause it, so ask early.
Time limits, what you must do before going to court, and how compensation is worked out all differ from state to state. This page sets out the ACT's rules in plain language. We are based in Newcastle, NSW, and act for people across Australia.
What every claim needs
Whichever state you're in, a medical negligence claim needs all three of these. What medical negligence is explains the basics.
Care fell short
Your care was below what was accepted as competent practice at the time.
In plain terms: experts compare your care with the guidelines of the day.
It caused harm
That shortfall caused your injury, or made it worse than it would have been.
In plain terms: better care would have made a real difference.
You claim in time
You start the claim within the ACT's time limit.
In plain terms: the ACT is strict, so get advice straight away.
Time limits in the ACT
Operation years ago?
Possibly, but the ACT is the strictest place in Australia. A claim for injury from medical treatment generally has to start within three years of the injury, and the usual court power to extend time may not be available.
That doesn't always end the matter: there may be other routes, for example where your child was injured, where the treatment happened in another state, or where the harm arose later than the treatment. If your treatment in the ACT was some time ago, please get advice straight away rather than ruling yourself out.
The detail
In the ACT, a claim for personal injury from medical treatment generally has to be started within three years of the date of the injury (Limitation Act 1985 (ACT) s 16B). The ACT is stricter than most places: the usual court power to extend limitation periods may not be available for these claims, so do not wait.
Children: special rules may apply to people injured while under 18. Get advice early.
How the ACT judges whether care was negligent
Unlike most states, the ACT has no statutory "peer professional opinion" test. Whether care was reasonable is decided by the court on the evidence, including independent expert opinion, applying the common law set by the High Court in Rogers v Whitaker.
Compensation in the ACT
The ACT has no statutory cap on damages for pain and suffering, and no percentage threshold. Damages are assessed by the court under the common law. Lost earnings, treatment costs and care are claimed separately. Our compensation guide explains each part.
Before going to court
The Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) sets out pre-court procedures for personal injury claims, including giving the other side a notice of claim with set timeframes. These steps run alongside the short limitation period, which is another reason to get advice early.
Whatever state you're in, the first steps are the same: get your medical records, write down what happened while you remember it, and get independent advice. Read how a claim works.
Complaints in the ACT
Complaints about health services in the ACT go to the Health Services Commissioner at the ACT Human Rights Commission. Complaints about an individual practitioner can also go to Ahpra. See complaint or claim: which is right for you?
Start with what happened to you
Birth trauma
Injuries to mothers and babies in pregnancy, labour and birth
2Face, mouth & jaw
Nerve injury after dental, jaw and facial procedures
3Cosmetic & breast
Implants, infection, poor results and filler injuries
4Missed diagnosis
When a condition was caught too late, or not at all
5Spinal & neuro
Nerve damage and missed red flags around spinal care
6Surgery & hospital
Errors in theatre, on the ward and in hospital systems
7Endometriosis & gynae
Years of dismissal, and harm in gynaecological surgery
8Medication & devices
Prescribing harm, unwarned side effects and recalls
Questions people ask
How long do I have to make a medical negligence claim in the ACT?
The ACT is strict: generally three years from the injury, with very limited extensions. There can be other routes, so if your treatment was some time ago, get advice straight away rather than ruling yourself out.
Can a lawyer in Newcastle act for me in the ACT?
Yes. Peter Evans & Associates acts for people across Australia. Most of a medical negligence case is records, expert reports and meetings, which work well by phone and video, and we brief local counsel and experts where a case needs them.
Does making a complaint stop the time limit?
No. A complaint to a health complaints body or Ahpra can run alongside a claim, but the limitation period keeps running while it is dealt with.
Will it cost me anything to find out if I have a claim?
No. The first conversation and our free case review cost nothing, and there is no commitment to go further. See costs and how a claim is funded.
Questions about your care in the ACT?
We can look at what happened, check where you stand on time limits, and tell you plainly whether your care fell short. It's confidential, and there's no cost to find out.
ContactFree case reviewAbout the author and editorial standards
Written by Dr Rosemary Listing, PhD (Law). Rosemary is a medical negligence specialist and Of Counsel at Peter Evans & Associates in Newcastle, NSW. She has practised since 2013, worked on many hundreds of claims, and acts for people injured by medical care across Australia. Her doctoral research examined patterns of failure in medical negligence, and she is a Sessional Lecturer in Health Law at the University of Newcastle.
Rosemary is not medically qualified. Legal information on this page reflects the law as at the date below and is checked against the legislation listed in the references. Thresholds and caps change, usually each year. Read our editorial standards.
Last updated 3 November 2026. Next review May 2027.
References
- Limitation Act 1985 (ACT) ss 16B, 36
- Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) ch 5
- Hall & Wilcox, "Time's (not) up: limitation periods in medical negligence cases" (28 February 2024)
- Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479; [1992] HCA 58
This page is general information only. It isn't legal advice about your situation, and reading it doesn't create a lawyer and client relationship. Time limits are strict and the rules have exceptions, so please get advice about your own circumstances. If you are in crisis, call 000 or Lifeline on 13 11 14. Legal services are provided by Peter Evans & Associates.
Other states and territories